A repeatable research question
Start with a weekly competitor update, a product-category brief, or an approved feedback corpus.
FOR B2B PRODUCT MARKETING & INSIGHTS TEAMS
Marketing research agents. Evidence you can inspect.
Turn recurring competitor checks and scattered customer feedback into source-linked research briefs. Start with one research question, an approved source set, and analyst review.
(MARKETING RESEARCH AI AGENTS)
Automate the research assembly work.
01 — WHEN RESEARCH AUTOMATION FITS
Your analyst’s time belongs in the analysis.
For B2B product marketing and insights teams that repeat the same competitor checks or manually assemble research before every planning cycle. A useful pilot has one recurring question, a defined source set, and an analyst who can judge the output.
Sources you can use
Agree access rights, freshness requirements, and which internal or public sources belong in scope.
A named reviewer
An analyst reviews the evidence and interpretation before the brief informs decisions.
02 — ILLUSTRATIVE RESEARCH WORKFLOW
Every finding needs a path back to its source.
The workflow and output format we'd build around your research question and approved sources.
Assess this workflow for your teamCollect and date
Retrieve from approved sources and retain URLs, source dates, and access dates.
Compare and qualify
Separate direct findings from interpretation. Flag conflicting, stale, and missing evidence.
Prepare for analyst review
Deliver a brief, source register, and open questions. An analyst approves conclusions and distribution.
03 — HOW YOU JUDGE THE RESULT
Judge the research on a sample you can review.
We apply the same integration and quality-engineering discipline we use on production software. You judge the value on an evaluated sample built from your own sources.
Discuss a research sample
Source coverage
Check whether the brief covers the agreed sources and records inaccessible or missing material.
Citation accuracy
Confirm that each referenced source supports the finding associated with it.
Analyst effort
Measure correction effort and turnaround alongside coverage and freshness.
SOFYRUS AGENT DELIVERY FRAMEWORK
A research agent with an evidence standard.
Define the question and source set. Build the collection and synthesis workflow. Test citation accuracy, coverage, freshness, and analyst correction effort before recurring use.
Delivery phase
01 / Discover
Define one recurring research question, the current process, and the analyst time involved.
Phase 1 of 6
Delivery phase
02 / Design
Agree source access, permitted use, freshness requirements, output structure, and review ownership.
Phase 2 of 6
Delivery phase
03 / Connect & Build
Connect approved sources and implement collection, comparison, and a traceable source register.
Phase 3 of 6
Delivery phase
04 / Evaluate
Test citation support, source coverage, stale information, conflicting evidence, and unsupported conclusions.
Phase 4 of 6
Delivery phase
05 / Launch
Start with a bounded cadence and analyst approval before distribution.
Phase 5 of 6
Delivery phase
06 / Operate & Improve
Monitor source availability, correction effort, research turnaround, and changes to the brief.
Phase 6 of 6
RELEASE CRITERIA
Agree the evidence standard before we build.
01
Measure
Citation support
Evidence to review
Each sampled finding is supported by its linked source.
02
Measure
Coverage and freshness
Evidence to review
Agreed sources are represented; unavailable or stale material is flagged.
03
Measure
Analyst effort
Evidence to review
Record corrections and review time against the current process.
Note
Targets are agreed with your team and checked against your current baseline during the pilot.
A CONCRETE WAY TO START
Start with one recurring research question.
Most teams start with a Research Workflow Assessment, then an evaluated sample before any recurring use.
01
DEFINE THE OPPORTUNITY
Research Workflow Assessment
A research question, approved source set, output specification, and evaluation plan. Written scope and deliverables Recommendation to proceed, revise, or stop
Request an assessment02
TEST THE WORKFLOW
Evaluated Research Sample
One source-linked brief, a source register, and an analyst-reviewed evaluation. Acceptance criteria agreed in advance Expansion scoped separately
Discuss a sample03
SUPPORT THE ROLLOUT
Recurring Research Operations
A defined research cadence, source monitoring, and a review process. Ownership and reporting agreed in advance Changes evaluated before release
Discuss ongoing operationsEvery finding traceable
Each conclusion links back to a dated source your analysts can check.
Decide with evidence
The sample is evaluated before any recurring use is agreed.
Analysts stay in control
An analyst approves conclusions and distribution at every stage.
The first conversation is free and carries no commitment.
Paid engagement scope, fees, timelines, and responsibilities are agreed in a written proposal.
ONE WORKFLOW. A CONCRETE NEXT STEP.
Which research question does your team repeat every week?
Bring the question, a few typical sources, and the brief your team needs. We’ll discuss a bounded sample and how to evaluate it.